The ToDo list application fulfils a need for time management. In my own opinion and the opinion of the people I polled it would aid in peoples time management as a useful tool. I think the final product meets my expectations and is something I will actually use. In order for me to use it I will develop a user login section so it is not open to abuse.
The strongest aspects of my final production are:
1. The overall design – This received great praise from the people I polled and was considered a great aspect of the website.
2. Easy to use – This was also a very strong point of the final production. The people I polled rated this another strong point.
3. Tells you when you last updated – I found that this was a feature that was more valuable than first perceived.
4. Available on any web based device – This feature was the main idea I strived to accomplish as part of today's need for cross platform functionality.
Saturday, 18 April 2009
Friday, 17 April 2009
Evaluation
What I would do next time:
1. I would firstly add a security feature to keep the contents safe from hackers and miscreants.
2. I would also add an edit task feature which is somewhat important.
3. I would also add a feature so that it would be easy to add, remove and edit the different categories.
What is good?
1. I would firstly add a security feature to keep the contents safe from hackers and miscreants.
2. I would also add an edit task feature which is somewhat important.
3. I would also add a feature so that it would be easy to add, remove and edit the different categories.
What is good?
- The over all design
- The coloured categories
- Tasks are ordered by date so the most important ones are first
- Easy to use
- Tells you when it was last updated
- Available on any web based device
- Quick to add a task
- Server can make backups
- Easy to maintain
- Cannot edit a task – Must delete and submit again
- Must have an internet ready device
- Cannot order by custom priority
- Cannot easily add or remove a category
- No security – Could have a login feature
Thursday, 16 April 2009
Final Questionnaire
I asked the same sample of 10 people the following questions:
1. Is the final application intuitive?
2. Please rate the design from 1-10 (10 being highest).
3. On testing; did you find it worked on the devices you tested it on?
4. Please rate the amount/quality of features from 1-10 (10 being highest).
5. Please rate the usability factor for your use from 1-10 (10 being highest).
6. Please rate the security of the To-Do List from 1-10 (10 being highest)
7. Would you use the application?
8. What are the strengths of the application?
9. What are the weaknesses of the application?
The average results are as follows:
1. Is the final application intuitive? Yes 100%
2. Please rate the design from 1-10 (10 being highest). 9
3. On testing; did you find it worked on the devices you tested it on? Yes (100%)
4. Please rate the amount/quality of features from 1-10 (10 being highest). 7
5. Please rate the usability factor for your use from 1-10 (10 being highest). 8
6. Please rate the security of the To-Do List from 1-10 (10 being highest) 2
7. Would you use the application? Yes (80%)
8. What are the strengths of the application? Design, easy to use and cross platform compatibility
9. What are the weaknesses of the application? Cannot edit a task and easy to hack.
Conclusion:
The results of the questionnaire are very pleasing and show what I have made is usable, works and adheres to the specification I set. I would however change the fact it has no security as it got such a low score.
1. Is the final application intuitive?
2. Please rate the design from 1-10 (10 being highest).
3. On testing; did you find it worked on the devices you tested it on?
4. Please rate the amount/quality of features from 1-10 (10 being highest).
5. Please rate the usability factor for your use from 1-10 (10 being highest).
6. Please rate the security of the To-Do List from 1-10 (10 being highest)
7. Would you use the application?
8. What are the strengths of the application?
9. What are the weaknesses of the application?
The average results are as follows:
1. Is the final application intuitive? Yes 100%
2. Please rate the design from 1-10 (10 being highest). 9
3. On testing; did you find it worked on the devices you tested it on? Yes (100%)
4. Please rate the amount/quality of features from 1-10 (10 being highest). 7
5. Please rate the usability factor for your use from 1-10 (10 being highest). 8
6. Please rate the security of the To-Do List from 1-10 (10 being highest) 2
7. Would you use the application? Yes (80%)
8. What are the strengths of the application? Design, easy to use and cross platform compatibility
9. What are the weaknesses of the application? Cannot edit a task and easy to hack.
Conclusion:
The results of the questionnaire are very pleasing and show what I have made is usable, works and adheres to the specification I set. I would however change the fact it has no security as it got such a low score.
Testing
I have commenced testing on all popular web browsers. It worked perfectly on Firefox, Safari, Opera and Google Chrome. I did however have some trouble with Internet Explorer v8 which was solved with a simple line of code. After reading about the new browser from Microsoft I found that it does not conform to the old standards of HTML which is why lots of websites have issues. It does have a compatibility mode but this did not work in my case and I wouldn't expect the users to have to use this. I however fixed the bug for Internet Explorer 8 users. I also tested the website on two PDA's, iPhone and Sony Playstation 3 and it worked flawlessly. Here are two screenshots of the testing:
Firefox v3:

Internet Explorer v8:

Safari (Mac OSx):
Firefox v3:

Internet Explorer v8:

Safari (Mac OSx):
Wednesday, 15 April 2009
On the agenda
The following still needs to be done:
Testing - Test the compatibility on different web browsers such as Firefox and Internet Explorer.
Questionnaire - I will commence another questionnaire to get some feedback on what I have created. I will use the same people and sample size as last time.
Evaluation - What could I change if I were to do it again?
Conclusion - Does it meet the needs of the users? Have I strayed from the original specification?
Testing - Test the compatibility on different web browsers such as Firefox and Internet Explorer.
Questionnaire - I will commence another questionnaire to get some feedback on what I have created. I will use the same people and sample size as last time.
Evaluation - What could I change if I were to do it again?
Conclusion - Does it meet the needs of the users? Have I strayed from the original specification?
Put together
Sunday, 12 April 2009
Overdue date code
Below is the code which tells the browser how to output a ToDo List item which is overdue:

It tells the browser to check the time, compare it with the time in the database and display any overdue items with a red font. It will also display the category in brackets next to the item as the text is red which takes away from the colour recognition.

It tells the browser to check the time, compare it with the time in the database and display any overdue items with a red font. It will also display the category in brackets next to the item as the text is red which takes away from the colour recognition.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

